Navigation

Search


Categories

On this page

This Is My Workflow When Designing A New Eagle Part Library I Like To Buy The Part Before
TS-2 Rev.B Preamp Redesign
Portable Preamp TS-2 Redesign
TS-2 Mic Preamp Redesign
FiveFishStudios - X-12mk500 Lunchbox (API 500 Series) Preamps
X-12 Preamps in a 1u rack case.
SC-1 Lunchbox preamps racked in a 1u case
X-12 Mic Preamp with Discrete OpAmps 2520 style
X-12 Mic Preamp Kit
SC-1mk2 with Cinemag Input Transformers, 1u 4-channel
White vs Yellow fill paint
NEW SC-1mk2 Mic Preamp Kit with Input Transformers
TS-2 Mic Preamp Prototype
New PSU-4448mk2 Power Supply Kit for Yamaha PM1000 modules (adjustable output voltages)
TS-2 Prototype Working!!!
TS-2 Mic Preamp - Testing & Working!
TS-2 Mic Preamp - Motherboard
TS-2 Mic Preamp - Switchboard Prototype
TS-2 Mic Preamp Prototype PCBs
PSU-4448 Kit Assembly Instructions
SC-1 Mic Preamp Kit : INSERT jack
SC-1 Mic Preamp Kit : More Noise Testing
SC-1 Mic Preamp Kit : Racking Finished!
SC-1 Mic Preamp Kit : Racking prototype
SC-1 Mic Preamp Kit : Power Consumption
SC-1 Mic Preamp Kit : INSERT feature
SC-1 Mic Preamp Kit : Fighting the Noise
SC-1 Mic Preamp Kit : Progress Report 2
SC-1 Mic Preamp Kit : Progress Report
PM1000 PSU PCB
DIY: SC-1 Mic Preamp - PCB + Kit
Sony MXP-3036 Preamp + EQ
DIY: PSU for Yamaha PM1000 preamp
PCB for my PRE-1048 preamp
DIY: PSU PCB
DIY: Racking Sony MXP Preamps and EQ modules
DIY: Split Power Supply with 48V Phantom Power
DIY: Building the Gyraf SSL Compressor
Building a DIY 1176 Compressor - Part 2
How to build your own stereo microphone for less than $10
Attention: Moogheads... Builld your own Modular Synths
Build your own MP3 Player
FREE PCB CAD Design software

Archive

Blogroll

RSS 2.0 | Atom 1.0 | CDF

Send mail to the author(s) E-mail

Total Posts: 119
This Year: 0
This Month: 0
This Week: 0
Comments: 8

SC-1mk2 and SC-1mk500 Mic Preamp Kits



SC-1mk2 Preamp Kit  SC-1mk500 Lunchbox Preamp Kit 
 Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Wednesday, July 28, 2010 7:59:14 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  |  )
This is my workflow when designing a new Eagle part library.

I like to buy the part beforehand, if possible. This gives me the chance to touch it and visually inspect the part and verify that the part dimensions match the working drawings from the manufacturer.

If working drawings from the manufacturer are not available, I use my digital caliper to make detailed dimensions of the part outline, and pin spacing and pin diameters.

If official PDF working drawings/datasheet are available, I use it though. Trust, but Verify.

Today, we're creating an Eagle part library for a switch.

Opening the datasheet, we look for the part dimensions.


In this case, we also take note of the switch positions, to see which terminals are connected depending on the switch position (up or down).



Next step is creating the schematic symbol for the part. In this case, an SPDT switch.

We also add "pins" to the schematic symbol. I use a "point" when defining pins on the schematic symbol.

I also like to match the "pin numbers" with the actual pin numbers used by the manufacturer.... makes life simpler.



Next, is creating the physical outline of the part. This is the FUN part for me. I like to make the part looking as authentic as possible. We also take care that we're following the part dimensions specified by the manufacturer. Don't forget to check pin spacings, and most importantly... pin DIAMETER. Since the PCBs will have plated through holes, I make the pad diameters just a hair-thin slightly bigger.

To make working easier, make sure to set your snaps and grid to 0.05" square, and 0.01" for the fine grid spacing.

And make sure holes/pads are centered on each "snap."



Make a print out your part and overlay the real part against your "printed part outline." Check if the holes, dimensions are correct and aligned. You may need several passes to get this right if you don't have official working drawings and just relying on caliper measurements.

If everything looks good, then we proceed to the next step.

Now, we tie together (match) the pin#s we created in the schematic symbol with the actual pin#s in the part outline.

This is also a good time to enter a part description field. I try to include Mouser or Digikey part #s in the description.



Next step is I try to use the new part library in a test schematic.

I want to verify that when I connect other components to this new part, that the correct pins correspond with the PCB design.

This is a good time to catch any errors you've made in pin-matching.

Here's our test schematic. R1 is connected to terminal #1 of the switch, R2 connected to terminal #2 and R3 connected to terminal #3.



Then we switch to the Board Layout view and verify that it's correct.



And we see that everything is OK. The pin #s in the schematic match the pin#s in the board layout.

In Eagle, the text ">NAME" and ">VALUE" are special. Eagle will substitute these text with the actual part name and part value in your schematic.

So in the symbol editor, let's add these text. Put the ">NAME" in the NAMES layer and put ">VALUE" in the VALUES layer.



In the Device Editor, click the Prefix button. Enter a prefix text.



Since this is a switch, we could use the prefix "SW" or "S". Now when you add multiple parts in your schematic, it will be renamed "SW1", "SW2", "SW3".... (Of course, you need to have ">NAME" present in the symbol, see step above.)


And we're done.
| | # 
 Monday, December 28, 2009
Monday, December 28, 2009 11:04:46 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  |  )
A flash of inspiration... I found a smaller footprint output transformer I can use... so I created an Eagle part library for that. (Tip: use a digital caliper when creating part libraries)

After some creative rearranging of parts, and I made this.

This is just the motherboard. Measuring about 6" x 6".


Ch-check it out!

2 Input Transformers - NEW FEATURE
2 Output Transformers - NEW FEATURE
Gain and Trim knob for each channel
2 VU Meters
4 Full size XLRs
Relay Controlled switching - NEW FEATURE
Bigger DC Converters - NEW FEATURE
... and better PCB layout by re-arranging parts.

Also, reduced the number of molex connectors from the original (7) to a single 10-pin Molex! That will be a big time-saver.... plus the use of PCB mounted XLR Neutrik Jacks.

| | # 
 Thursday, December 17, 2009
Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:16:09 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  |  |  )
The TS-2 has been getting some traction recently... and I'm thinking maybe it's time to revisit this product again and do a Revision B.

The first TS-2 design was very good, and I love the sound of it! (Of course, it's based on the SC-1mk500 and SC-1mk2 preamps, but in a smaller form factor.)

But assembling a single TS-2 unit takes up a lot of time/manpower and with the small profit I have on each unit, it's a losing proposition. I'd come out ahead if I DON'T build a TS-2!

So to fix this problem, I'd need to raise TS-2 prices, or reduce my production cost, or a little bit of both. For now, I'm going to concentrate on reducing production cost. With today's economy, it may not be smart to raise prices (unless that price increase brings with it additional features that the original TS-2 didn't have.)

Question: So what can I do to reduce production cost?
Answer: Reduce the time/manpower to build a TS-2 unit.

Question: How can I reduce time to build a TS-2 unit?
Answer: Good question...

I'm thinking of several possibilities.
1. Through automation. Using SMD parts and pick and place machines. Ask a manufacturer to build the boards for me.

Cons: A little on the expensive side, and requires a lot of capital. I think 100 boards is the minimum. Assuming it will cost $50 per board assembly fee, 100pcs is a staggering $5000!

And I doubt it will cost only $50 per board... maybe closer to $100. And that's just the labor. The cost of parts for 100 boards is not included yet.

2. Minimize "wiring". Yes, soldering wires to the PCB board and connectors, and jacks take a lot of time. So if we can get rid of "flying wires", then that will reduce a lot of time and labor. So as much as possible, use PCB mounted jacks, switches, LEDs, etc... everything should be soldered to the PCB. No more hookup wires, if I can avoid it!



3. Reduce the number of PCBs. Right now, the original TS-2 preamp has 4 PCBs. A motherboard and a switchboard, and 2 VU meter PCBs.
That's a lot! And of course, there are hookup wires to connect all 4 PCBs to each other (see #2 above). So I need to reduce the number of boards required to build a TS-2.



I've upgraded my PCB design software last year, to allow me to make the bigger boards. Unfortunately, the TS-2 board design was prior to my software upgrade.

Now, with the ability to make bigger boards, I think I'll be able to combine more functions in a single board.

We've got plenty of real estate space FREE!



What else...

Revision B will also give the user the option to have INPUT TRANSFORMERS! So that will be cool! Maybe even add a switch to bypass Input Transformer. Hmmm... I'm getting too far ahead here.

So that's my goal.... redesign the TS-2 preamp to minimize wiring, combine more functionality in a single board, and add some new features.

| | # 
 Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:41:57 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  )
My parts arrived for my TS-2 prototype. I ordered the parts so I can judge their quality and size, get dimensions and pin spacings so I can create Eagle part libraries for it.

I Found a 4-LED vertical, PCB mount, Right-Angle part. I think I'll use this for the VU meters for the new TS-2RevB. I wish it was a 5-LED device, but 4 will do.

Also, I'm beefing up the DC-DC converter. It only cost a few dollars more than my previous converter, and a big step up in power, so why not? Plus, I have the real-estate board space for it.

The 48V section DC-DC converter is home-grown, developed here in FFS Lab. That will remain unchanged. I think I'll just add some overvoltage protection.

Larger filtering caps will be added too.... again, thanks to the bigger board space.

I'm thinking of adding relays for polarity reverse functions, but a non-latching relay will be consuming power while engaged, and that will be a drain on the battery. A better solution is to use latching relays (they only consume power when changing states), but controlling those will be more complicated than a simple relay. So this is still up in the air.... or maybe I should just get rid of the polarity switch? < what do you think? >

On the original TS-2, there is a switch to turn on/off the VU meters to conserve battery power. What if this switch is instead used as a High Pass filter? Then again, this will be another relay to control. ... which will affect power consumption, etc... Plus, a single switch will be controlling 2 HPF channels? That doesn't sound right.

The compromise decision making process is driving me nuts.

| | # 
 Monday, November 30, 2009
Monday, November 30, 2009 2:41:57 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  |  |  |  )
Last October, I held a sale of my X-12mk500 preamps.
 http://fivefishstudios.com/index.php/X-12mk500-Mic-Preamp-Kit.html

These are some of the units that went out to customers... <drool>

Thanks to all my customers that support FiveFish Studios DIY Mic Preamp kits.
Some photos:


from another angle

| | # 
 Thursday, October 01, 2009
Friday, October 02, 2009 3:49:22 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  |  |  )


Lunchbox pres racked in a 1u case

Just a test.... Smile checking clearances, and how the whole thing will look.

The real deal will be a setup for (2) X-12 pres.


update:



Finished X-12 preamp, 2 channel in a 1u rack.




check it out... We now have audio samples of the X-12 Mic Preamp.

http://fivefishstudios.com/index.php/Audio-Samples.html

Special thanks to Farview Recording (Jay Walsh) and Jason Mallow. You guys ROCK! Also thanks to Madison Rhoades for the vocal clips.

Check out the Servant song... all tracks recorded through an X-12 Mic Preamp.

| | # 
 Friday, April 24, 2009
Friday, April 24, 2009 2:26:24 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  |  )


SC-1mk500 Lunchbox pres racked in a 1u case. If there are any interests in this configuration, email me at info@fivefishstudios.com

| | # 
 Sunday, March 01, 2009
Sunday, March 01, 2009 3:24:17 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  |  )
More photos showing discrete opamps installed on the board. You don't need to desolder the 8pin IC socket. Just install the MillMax sockets and the discrete opamp will install with enough cleareance above the IC socket. (You'd need to remove the PDIP8 IC chip.)

with a JFET-992


with APP2050 (Made in Italy)


with APP10 (Made in Italy)

| | # 
 Friday, February 27, 2009
Friday, February 27, 2009 3:22:44 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  |  )
Image

This preamp was inspired by A certain Preamp Indeed!

But no, it's not a clone. Rather, I'd like to call it my FiveFish version :)

It uses input transformers with high-nickel and mumetal shielding, monolithic opamps and also has the option to use 990/992/2520 discrete opamps, null offset, output transformers, on-board voltage regulators, Relay-controlled -20dB Pads and Polarity Reverse, Soft-start phantom power, LED-lighted push button swithes, Grayhill selector switch, Bourns pot.

It uses a very very low distortion opamp chip for amplification, coupled to a high current, high-slew rate (2000V/us) video buffer driver subjecting that output transformer into submission.

The sound is huge and beefy... it will fight back when pushed hard, and slap you up and down silly to let you know who's boss... kinda like a rock n roll club bouncer.

(VU meter not shown in above photo, 5-LED VU Metering included in kit.)

| | # 
 Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Tuesday, February 24, 2009 3:32:26 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  |  )
Just finished this unit for a customer... 4 channels of transformer goodness!





| | # 
 Saturday, December 20, 2008
Saturday, December 20, 2008 3:30:14 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  |  |  )
What looks better? I can't decide. Help me.

The white paint fill "pops out"... and is very clear and bright. But seems drab and lacks personality.

The yellow has "personality" and not boring like white. But I'm not sure if I like the yellow.

These are Testors model paint by the way.

| | # 
 Sunday, November 16, 2008
Sunday, November 16, 2008 3:33:29 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  |  )
SC1-mk2 Mic Preamp Kit


Now, with optional Input Transformer option!
Improved design, improved performance, design refinements.
Uses the same "footprint" as the original SC-1, so you can use this new kit in our 1u SC-1 Rack Case.
Have 2 channels of clean/uncolored preamp and 2 channels of "flavored" preamp
Local PSU regulation for a 2nd-level filtering of power supply.
DC Servo, Dual Buffered design
THAT and Burr-Brown chips
Using uMetal shielded Input Transformer for excellent magnetic shielding
6dB gain steps in the lower range, and 4db gain steps in the upper range for more precise control
Using standard 0.1" pitch pads for power and XLR connections, Molex 0.1" compatible
Bourns, conductive plastic potentiometers
Grayhill, mil-spec selector switches
0.079" thick PCB with 2 oz. copper, Solder mask, silkscreen, plated-through holes, Lead-free Rohs

More ordering choices, more package deal combinations for better discount!
Flexible ordering with or without PSU, Rack Case, Input Transformers, etc... to fit your DIY budget.

More photos:








| | # 
 Tuesday, August 19, 2008
Tuesday, August 19, 2008 5:57:23 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  )
So hooked up my battery and 2 condenser mics to the pre... turn on power, turn on phantom for both channels, and recorded the VU meter "in action"...

Note: The audio in the video was recorded by the camera.

Youtube video here. (Make sure to watch in high quality mode and view the annotations.)



Enjoy!

| | # 
 Thursday, August 07, 2008
Thursday, August 07, 2008 6:57:06 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  |  )
Newly redesigned, improved, PSU-4448mk2 Kit!

Now, both rails are adjustable via onboard trimmers for that 100% perfect voltage setting.
Also two on-board LEDs... which you can wire to your front panel to use as a POWER ON indicator.
100% more filtering. More capacitors for ripple filtering.
Standard 0.1" pad spacing so you can use standard 0.1" headers.



| | # 
 Monday, July 28, 2008
Monday, July 28, 2008 5:58:31 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  )
Finally finished one channel and did some testing.... THE MOMENT OF TRUTH is coming! Will it work or not???

Woohoooo!!!!! YES! Smile Smile Smile

At first I wasn't getting any signal and was in a bit of panic... I'm thinking "oh no... what did I do wrong?"

Told myself I need to calm down and re-check everything step by step. Found out I have a loose connection since everything is just temporarily affixed with tape and alligator clips. Secured that connection and now we have continuity.

Device Under Test
Working properly and great.... and powered from a 12VDC power source, wall wart or battery.


Then I heard music... coming from my signal source... YES! It works and passes signal. Sounds good too! Pretty stoked about it. Check the gain settings, it works... check the trim, it works. I tested it with a line level input and an SM57 dynamic mic, and yes, sounds great. I haven't tested it yet with condenser mics since I don't have the switchboard hooked up yet... (the switchboard has the 48V phantom power converter).

After an hour of music listening, hooked it up to my signal gen and oscilloscope to see out how things are.

Check it out... here's the square wave response at 1Khz. Notice how clean and sharp the square wave response is... no ringing, oscillations or instability at either the rising and falling edges!

Square Wave Response 1Khz
Super sharp square wave response. Nice audio quality.


Did some output measurements while we're at it... how high an output can we go before clipping or instability. I'm not expecting it to be high (like +27/28dBu) since we're not using high supply voltages here, just a DC-DC converter PSU... but let's see what can we get...

Not bad.... not bad at all. Some readings....

15Hz @ 32Vpp = +23 dBu
20Hz @ 35.6Vpp = +24dBu
1Khz @ 37.7Vpp = +24.7 dBu
22Khz @ 31.1Vpp = +23dBu
100Khz @ 24.4Vpp = +20dBu
200Khz @ 14.65Vpp = +16.5dBu

Output waveform at 100Khz.



What's the Next Step?

Build the 2nd channel on the TS-2 preamp board, then test together the Motherboard and Switchboard...
Metalwork/CNC for the case, verify measurements and hole locations

So far, I'm pretty pleased with how everything is working out, from concept and design on paper, to CAD, to a working prototype.

| | # 
 Sunday, July 27, 2008
Monday, July 28, 2008 3:24:50 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  )

Finally finished one channel and did some testing.... THE MOMENT OF TRUTH is coming! Will it work or not???

Woohoooo!!!!! YES!  Grin Grin Grin

At first I wasn't getting any signal and was in a bit of panic... I'm thinking "oh no... what did I do wrong?" 

Told myself I need to calm down and re-check everything step by step. Found out I have a loose connection since everything is just temporarily affixed with tape and alligator clips. Secured that connection and now we have continuity.

Device Under Test


Then I heard music... coming from my signal source... YES! It works and passes signal. Sounds good too! Pretty stoked about it.  Check the gain settings, it works... check the trim, it works.  I tested it with a line level input and an SM57 dynamic mic, and yes, sounds great.  I haven't tested it yet with condenser mics since I don't have the switchboard hooked up yet... (the switchboard has the 48V phantom power converter).

After an hour of music listening, hooked it up to my signal gen and oscilloscope to see out how things are. 

Check it out... here's the square wave response at 1Khz.  Notice how clean and sharp the square wave response is... no ringing, oscillations or instability at either the rising and falling edges!

Square Wave Response 1Khz


Did some output measurements while we're at it... how high an output can we go before clipping or instability. I'm not expecting it to be high (like +27/28dBu) since we're not using high supply voltages here, just a DC-DC converter PSU... but let's see what can we get...

Not bad.... not bad at all.  Some readings....

15Hz @ 32Vpp      = +23 dBu
20Hz @ 35.6Vpp   = +24dBu
1Khz @ 37.7Vpp    = +24.7 dBu
22Khz @ 31.1Vpp   = +23dBu
100Khz @ 24.4Vpp = +20dBu
200Khz @ 14.65Vpp = +16.5dBu

Output waveform at 100Khz.



What's the Next Step?

Build the 2nd channel on the TS-2 preamp board, then test together the Motherboard and Switchboard...
Metalwork/CNC for the case, verify measurements and hole locations
 
So far, I'm pretty pleased with how everything is working out, from concept and design on paper, to CAD, to a working prototype.
| | # 
 Saturday, July 26, 2008
Sunday, July 27, 2008 3:24:01 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  )

Anyways... finally got some time tonight to do some work on the motherboard.

First, populated the PSU section to see if it works... yup, A.O.K.  (had to jumper the switch temporarily since the motherboard isn't hooked to the switchboard.)

So far so good, the switchboard, 48V section, and now the DC-DC section are all working fine.

Work done so far... all resistors, zeners and diodes stuffed.


Tomorrow after church service, I'll solder the caps, IC sockets, pots and switches and XLRs, then start testing.

| | # 
Sunday, July 27, 2008 3:23:06 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  )
Built the TS-2 switchboard PCB, tested the 48V phantom power section and it works A.O.K!

LEDs will be mounted under the board.

I can already see a few minor changes to the board design... need to push the switches a bit more forward, maybe by 0.1"

The height clearance is perfect... about 1mm for the caps and about 2mm for the switches between these parts and the celing height of the case. Real tight... 

Again, here's the initial design that existed only on the computer.


And here it is, in real life Smiley  (with a few minor changes as you can see.)


Now, off to build the main motherboard.  Grin

| | # 
 Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Thursday, July 24, 2008 3:21:03 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  )
UPDATED:

New prototype boards came in today... wohoo!


Let's do some test fittings...

The (2) VU Meters


and oh yeah.... 2 input transformers.


This is the switchboard...


A preview of things to come...


Next step: Build a prototype using these new boards and see if it works.

| | # 
 Monday, April 30, 2007
Monday, April 30, 2007 11:06:31 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  |  )

Assembly Instructions

Disclaimer:
Working with high voltages (110V/220V) can be lethal. Work at your own risk. Soldering irons are hot. Use caution.

Tools Required:

1. Cutter Pliers
2. Long Nose Pliers
3. Soldering iron (adjustable temperature preferred), or 25-30W soldering iron. (Do not use 100W soldering iron.)
4. Solder lead (60/40 or equivalent)

Step-by-Step Assembly Instructions:

If you bought the kit, all the onboard PCB parts are already included, sorted, and labeled for your convenience. Click here to order the PSU-4448 KIT.


ORDER THE PSU-4448 KIT or PCB.

TIP:

1. Solder components from the smallest/shortest to the biggest/tallest component in that order. This makes assembly easier.

2. Do not use too much solder lead. Use just enough to make a good connection. The PCB is plated-through hole, and molten solder lead will flow into the hole to ensure a good connection. You don't need globs of solder to make a good connection.

3. Work slowly and carefully, especially if this is your first time. Double-check parts before soldering them. It's easier to solder something in, that to desolder them out (if you make a mistake).

4. If you make a mistake solder a part in the PCB (example, wrong location, or wrong orientation/placement), you will need a desoldering tool to suck the solder out from the board.  Even then, the part may not easily get out. The easiest thing to do is to "sacrifice" the part, cut the leads, use a long nose pliers to hold the lead, heat the pad while pulling the leads out. Then use a desoldering tool to open the hole. So as I said, double check parts before committing to solder them.

 

Step 1:

Solder all resistors, and diodes to the board.

(2pcs) 220 ohms - RED-RED-BROWN

(1pc) 8.2K (8K2) - GRY-RED-RED

(1pc) 7.5K (7K5) - VIOLET-GRN-RED   = this is marked on the PCB as 7.68K

Note the orientation of the (4) diodes on the board. The white band should all be on top.

Step 2:

Next, solder the 0.1uf capacitor. You may need to open up the legs of the capacitors a bit to fit in the holes.

 

They'll go into the PCB looking like this.

Step 3:

Next, solder the bridge rectifier W02G. Note the orientation of the component and where the flat side is pointing.

 

Step 4:

Next, solder the (4) electrolytic capacitors. (2pcs) of 10uf and (2pcs) of 1uf.  You will need to open up the legs of the 1uf a little bit to go into the hole.

 

This is what your PCB board should look like at this point of the assembly. Note the capacitors.

 

Step 5:

Next, solder the (2) LM317 regulators to the board. For aesthetics, make sure they're the same height when you solder them. Also, note the orientation. The flat side (heatsink mounting part) should be facing towards the outside of the PCB.

 

Step 6:

The only thing remaining to do now is solder the (2) big electrolytic capacitors.

TIP: The capacitors are snap-in type. So when you put place them on the PCB, do a twisting motion. When you solder the capacitor, the (-) leg of the capacitor is tied to the ground plane of the PCB. The PCB copper can suck the heat out of your soldering iron. So make sure to bump up the temperature of your soldering iron up.

TESTING:

Solder AC1 and AC2 terminals of the board to the SECONDARY windings of your power transformer. Apply power to your power transformer, and measure that you're getting 44V and 48V DC at the output of the PSU board.

Note: You may not measure EXACTLY get 44 and 48V due to component tolerances. But if it's of by a few millivolts, you'd be fine. If you're measuring something like 0V or 60V or higher, something is wrong and most probably you have a short somewhere.

If everything checks out, then attach a heatsink to each voltage regulator. I recommend you use TO-220 insulators/spacers so there is no electrical connection between the heatsink and the regulator. You can also use TWO SEPARATE heatsinks, one for each regulator. Just make sure the two heatsinks DO NOT touch each other.

BUY the Power Supply KIT or PCB

Order PSU-4448 PCB. Only $20.00 per PCB
Plus $3.00 for shipping to US addresses (except HI,PR)

 

KITS ARE NOW AVAILABLE!

Order PSU-4448 PCB+KIT. Only $30.00 per KIT
Plus $5.00 for shipping to US addresses (except HI,PR)


| | # 
 Sunday, April 29, 2007
Monday, April 30, 2007 1:46:53 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  |  )
Found a 1/4" TRS jack with NC switches, wired them to the prototype preamp and tested it using standard INSERT cables. Hooked up an EQ unit, and mannn... it works!

Some pics.



The noise level does increase when you hookup a 3rd party unit via Inserts since now the signal has a longer route to travel, and also going out unbalanced, and coming back in unbalanced.

But definitely, the preamp can be fitted with INSERT jacks. The volume control of the SC-1 preamp also controls how much signal goes out to the INSERTed device.

Another photo:

Connecting an RNC to the SC-1 preamp via Insert cables.





| | # 
Sunday, April 29, 2007 11:04:54 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  |  )

Did the noise floor at max gain drop at all?

By -1dB! But it's probably awash. It could have been better.

Using the external gain switch with about almost 6" of wires (3" going to, 3" coming back) made RF noise worse. See that clump of white wires there going to the switch?

But "grounding" the case made the unit quieter. In fact, it's a different kind of quiet hissing sound. And again, you only hear this hiss sound at max volume and at +66 and +72dB gain. Anything below that gain and it's super quiet/silent.

Maybe that's why a certain commercial preamp's max gain level setting is only 59dB! I won't mention names. :)

My recommendation: On the final kit, don't save a few bucks to buy a $6 plastic rotary switch instead of the $16 Bourns PCB-mounted, metal selector switch originally spec'd. The wiring job is tedious.

See that big clump of white wires in the photo? Touch it and you'd pick up all sorts of AM radio. (+72dB gain = 4000x amplification!)

But I do know some people are interested in using hookup wires instead of the onboard selector switch so I had to try it. It could work, it will just take more time assembling it, and there could be more potential noise/RF problems. Neat wiring and soldering job is a must if going this route.

Right now, I measured noise floor at -63dB and -64dB @ +72dB gain.
And -70 to -69dB at +66dB gain.
-76 to -75dB at +60dB gain.

photos at +72dB gain.

| | # 
Sunday, April 29, 2007 11:04:03 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  |  )

FINISHED!!!!!!!!!

Worked on this project this Friday, Saturday and Sunday.... whew!

Since I used an external 12-pos switch, I basically had to solder 13 wires, so that equals 26 solder points per channel, or 52 solder points for 2 channels!!! I wouldn't recommend this approach. The wires are also prone to RFI pickup. I made the wires as short as I can but still, it's prone to pickup interference.

I would recommend you guys use the onboard PCB selector switch instead.

To fix the RF problem at 66dB and 72dB Gain, I "discovered" a new (new for me at least) of fixing ground loop/rf problems.

I wired the ground of the 1st channel to the XLR output gnd of the 2nd channel and vice versa. That lowered RF problems, but there was still some slight noise but I noticed that if I parallel the 2 gnd wires and stick them flat against the case, it fixed the RF problem. So that's what I did. You can see the "black tape" holding the 2 gnd wires flat against the case.

I don't know what to call this method... It is definitely NOT a star ground. It's more like an X ground.

Now, the only thing you hear is normal "hiss/white noise" at 100% volume @ 72dB gain! There also seem to be a spike at 15.7Khz. But at normal listening volume (unity gain on mixer), the hiss/white noise is only slight even at 72dB.

Some photos!!!

From this....

To this....

Some close-up photos.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rev3.00 PCB will be coming in middle of this week from the PCB manufacturer, and then I'll test those samples by building prototype #003 and #004.

| | # 
Sunday, April 29, 2007 11:01:13 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  |  )

April 20, 2007

I'm racking prototype #001 and #002. Getting ready to use it for sample recordings, so I need to be able to take it anywhere easily. I'd also like to see if racking it in a metal case will improve noise floor further... hope so!!!

Also going to test how the 7818/7918 PSU type regulators stack up vs. 317/337 type regulators. I want to see if 317/337 are really better than plain stock 7818/7918, or if it's just a myth.

This is still the PCB without the onboard pots and selectors. So I guess, we'll also see noise performance when using external pots and switches with hook-up wires.

Here are some photos.... sorry for the harsh shadows, I just used a single flash on the right side and didn't use any reflector on the left.

If you use on-board pots and switches, you can easily fit 4 preamp channels on a 1u rack... with plenty of room to spare in the back.

http://www.fivefish.net/diy/sc1/images/protocase2.jpg

The front view of the prototype rack. (On the background, you'll see my new "electronics assembly" factory. I'm getting ready to package some PSU kits to sell.)


Closeup of prototype #001.

The switch you see in the picture is just a jury-rigged DPDT switch using component leads soldered to the switch and PCB.

Closeup of prototype #002.

Knobs and switches and pots on front panel.


Back view showing IEC AC line filter connector, fuse, and Neutrik XLR male and female jacks.




| | # 
Sunday, April 29, 2007 11:00:11 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  |  )

Getting ready to build a PSU for this. I already have an 18-0-18 designed PSU, but I think I can still improve upon it. I'll try my Rev1 PSU design, and compare it with a 317/337 type psu. See which one is better.

The PSU kit will be sold separately from the SC-1 kit.

Current consumption for (2) channels.

+/- 26.4 mA (2 channels, with phantom power LED OFF)

If phantom power is ON, the LEDs consume a few milliamps.

if using a diffuse RED LED, it's consumption is 3.1mA x 2 = 6.2mA
total = 32.6mA

if using a clear RED LED, it's consumption is 4.9mA x 2 = 9.8mA
total = 36.2mA

Add another LED for the power on switch indicator... 4.9mA

And estimate about 10mA to 14mA for each phantom powered mic attached = 28mA

GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATE: 69.1 mAmps for 2 channels

To be on the safe side (with 100% safety factor), let's round it up to 140mA.

So the VA needed will be 18V x .140 Amp = 2.52VA

Looking at available toroidal transformers, we can buy a 3.2VA transformer (18V @ .178 Amps) - Good enough!

But if you'll be adding additional modules in the future, maybe the 7VA transformer (18V @ .388 amps) is a much better buy considering it's only $1 more expensive compared to the 3.2VA. - Recommended!



| | # 
Sunday, April 29, 2007 10:59:09 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  |  )

The SC-1 has one feature that I have not talked about much. It's got provisions for an INSERT.

Just like the Inserts in your mixer, the concept is I want to be able to add future signal processing to the SC-1 easily.

I envision in the future creating add-on modules to the SC-1. For example: Passive EQ, Active EQ, optical compressor, VCA compressor, etc... so all you'll need to do is solder 3 wires, remove the jumper JP2 and the add-on module is now part of the signal path.

If you're a purist, and you don't want anything else changing the sound... just don't add any modules.

If you want a preamp with an EQ, you can have it.
If you want a preamp with built-in compression, you can have it.
If you want THE WORKS, preamp with built-in compression, EQ, etc...

Just add the modules you want. You can see the 3 solder pads in the PCB in the photo below, near the lower left corner.

As far as the insert modules go, would it be possible to wire this as a 1/4" insert jack?

I looked into the datasheets, and it could work.

The SC-1 will have a 5K input impedance for the insert return. And the send can have a max +/- 13V swing (on a 15-0-15 supply) output voltageon a 2K load.

Note: the SC-1 will be powered by 18-0-18 so the output voltage swing could be higher.

(The Mackie 1402VLZ has 2.5k input impedance for the insert return. )

I'll try it out one of these days.

| | # 
 Saturday, April 28, 2007
Saturday, April 28, 2007 10:57:17 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  |  )

The saga continues... Time to get picky! I want to stamp out every possible problem that could happen.

Hooked up the preamp via 20ft xlr to trs cable. From the test preamp it went into a patch bay, then a 3ft cord, then to MOTU inputs.

Used Digital Performer to record the tracks and measure the "noise" DP registered in it's VU meters.

Gain position - Gain dB - VU meter reading
============================
1 - 0dB -90dB
2 - 6dB -90dB
3 - 12dB -90dB
4 - 18dB -90dB
5 - 24dB -90dB
6 - 30dB -90dB
7 - 36dB -84dB
8 - 42dB -74dB
9 - 48dB -66dB
10- 54dB -59dB
11- 60dB -52dB
12- 66dB -44dB

As you can see, noise started to increase at the 8th gain position -74dB reading for a 42dB of gain.

During my testing the other day, I did notice the oscillation on the 5th, 6th and 7th position which was reduced/eliminated by the bypass capacitors.

But the 0.1uf bypass caps were ineffective for gain position 8th and higher. ... and it shows in the readings above.

-74dB is still not too noticeable, but -59, -52 and -44dB are very high.

So I need to find a solution for this and get rid of this problem. I'm thinking a different value of bypass cap in parallel with the 0.1uf may work.

So for now, Rev3.00 PCB is on hold for manufacturing.

UPDATE
Incorporated some fixes. Added more bypass capacitors to the volume potentiometer. I think considering the volume pot is connected up via hookup wires instead of onboard the PCB is a contributing factor to the noise problem.

Picked an AM station when the preamp is hooked up directly to the RP8 monitor. Didn't happen when the pre was hooked up to the MOTU. Added another bypass cap to the volume knob and that solved the problem. Bye bye country radio!

Gain position - Gain dB - VU meter reading - New reading
============================
1 - 0dB -90dB -90dB
2 - 6dB -90dB -90dB
3 - 12dB -90dB -90dB
4 - 18dB -90dB -90dB
5 - 24dB -90dB -90dB
6 - 30dB -90dB -86dB
7 - 36dB -84dB -84dB
8 - 42dB -74dB -78dB
9 - 48dB -66dB -78dB
10- 54dB -59dB -65dB
11- 60dB -52dB -60dB
12- 66dB -44dB -55dB

DP's VU meter readings are better... especially at the 11th and 12th position. Oscillation at the higher gain settings fixed too.

Just for some layman terms...

60dB is 1000x amplification of the original signal.
66dB is 2000x amplification of the original signal.

BTW, without the preamp connected the best my system can do is -90dB. So the above -90dB readings probably should be lower.

I still want to be able to push noise lower for gain settings 54, 60 and 66dB maybe down to the -78dB mark.

The thing is since I'm using about 2" jumper to simulate my selector switch, most of the noise is coming in via this jumper. I can tell because depending on how the jumper wire is positioned, or if I'm touching it, the amount of noise varies. If I had a real selector switch soldered in, I know the readings will be even lower than above.

Another possible area where noise is coming in is via the hookup wires that connects to the external potentiometer. This piece of wire then goes directly to the balanced driver stage.

On Rev3.00 PCB, the gain selector switch and volume potentiometer will be onboard the PCB so we're talking about very minimum distances, no hookup wires and very close to the ground plane of the PCB. I don't think we'll have this problem on the Rev3 design.

So maybe I might go ahead and push to manufacturing...

more update
I decided to plugin again the SM57, crank the gain selector all the way to 66dB, and lowered the volume knob since the SM57 doesn't really need that much of a gain... hooked the preamp directly to the RP8 monitor and fired it up.

Better than yesterday and earlier today! It is quiet. The volume knob pot is like 1/5th up and it is already loud, of course considering it's at 66dB gain (amplifying 2000x) and no RF noise, no hum noise... YES, at 66dB setting!


Noise measurements:

I'm a little bummed that at the 60dB and 66dB gain settings, the SC-1 noise floor isn't lower than I expected. (@60dB, -52dB improved to -60dB; @66dB, -44dB improved to -55dB)

So I looked around the net at other equipment specs...

There's a lot of mumbo jumbo out there... Some measuring their noise with the inputs shorted to ground (which personally I don't agree) and some not specifying what's the volume level at (i.e. you can set gain to 66dB, but if you leave the volume only at 50% can get a low noise floor reading... deceiving don't you think?)

I found a Rane note (http://www.rane.com/note145.html) that says GAIN should be set to maximum (I did that) and the input TERMINATED with the expected source impedance. (Oh oh.... I did NOT do that.)

So, I goofed up. When I did the earlier noise measurements, I left the inputs hanging.

It should have been terminated with a 150-ohm resistor to simulate a mic connected to it. So I got a spare XLR jack, soldered a 150ohm resistor on pins 2 and 3, plugged it into the mic preamp and measured performance again.

WOW! Big difference! Much better.

(This also explains why the other day when I hooked up an SM57, it seems quiet and great, but when I checked the noise floor in DP (with inputs hanging), the readings were high.)

So here are the NEW and improved numbers!

Gain dB = Noise floor (Rs=150 ohms, Max Gain settings, volume at max)
================================
0dB = -90dB*
6 dB = -90dB*
12 dB = -90dB*
18 dB = -90dB*
24 dB = -90dB*
30 dB = -90dB*
36 dB = -88dB
42 dB = -85dB
48 dB = -80dB
54 dB = -74dB
60 dB = -69dB
66 dB = -64dB

* Note: The best my setup can do is -90dB, so I cannot measure anything below this.

** These are not EIN numbers.

And yes, the above values are at Max Gain, Volume knob all the way to the right - settings. This is real-world results, not theoretical calculated noise figure. This is what you'll see on your VU meters in your DAW software.

So this is the current score... we're at -64dB noise floor at 66dB gain.... much better! Now, the challenge is to reduce this further. But I'm just nit-picking here.

Noise Obsession

I've been pondering this noise issue for a couple of days now.

...... so last night, I'm trying to review my design and reviewing the data sheets....

I *KNOW* I have the resistor values for the mic pre stage I have were computed for 0 to 66dB gain. Then it goes to a servo, then to an unbalanced to balanced line driver.... which then goes to the MOTU inputs.

So I'm thinking... maybe it's the line driver stage giving me the noise problem??? The 1510 chip.

So I looked at the datasheet and something caught my eye.... the line driver stage ADDS ANOTHER 6dB GAIN!!!! DUHHHHH!!!! Of course! Going from unbalanced to balanced, gives you an additional +6dB gain!

So really, my preamp does not go from 0-66dB in 12 steps, BUT RATHER it goes from +6 to +72dB gain!!!! (i.e. 66dB mic pre gain + 6dB gain of balanced driver = 72dB total gain!)

So the correct noise figures compared to dB gain are:

Noise Floor at max gain settings, max volume, 150 ohm terminated inputs
6dB = -90dB*
12 dB = -90dB*
18 dB = -90dB*
24 dB = -90dB*
30 dB = -90dB*
36 dB = -90dB*
42 dB = -88dB
48 dB = -85dB
54 dB = -80dB
60 dB = -74dB
66 dB = -69dB
72 dB = -64dB

So there you go!

The FINAL SCORE!!!....

-69dB @ 66dB Gain with Rs=150 ohm terminated inputs, volume at max 100%. Which is about comparable to the RNP's noise floor and other non-transformer based IC mic pre design.

And for the icing on the cake, mine can go up to 72dB of gain, not just 66dB!!! -64dB @ +72dB gain (which is 4000x amplification!)

Not bad!

Found an oscilloscope plugin...
http://mdsp.smartelectronix.com/ffttools/2005/03/freakoscope-08-public-beta.php

continuing with this noise obsession... using the above plugin.

Since a picture is worth a thousand words.

| | # 
Saturday, April 28, 2007 10:55:44 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  |  )

Update:

Well, I spent some time working with the prototype.

Noticed some slight oscillation at the 5th, 6th, and 7th gain settings of the selector switch. So finally fixed that with additional bypass capacitors on the supply rails. We're talking about less than 0.2Volts oscillation on top of a 30Vpp output. So it's insignificant. But still, it's gone now. :)

As I said, this is Rev1.00 PCB I'm working on and it looks like on my Rev3.00 PCB, I've already incorporated those caps in the design.

Then connected the mic pre circuit output to the balanced line driver. And what do you know... the less than 0.2Volt oscillation fixed itself. The addtl caps weren't needed.

I can't wait any longer, and it's time to hear this with my own ears. So I connected my RP8 monitor to the preamp output jacks. And run the signal gen from 20Hz to 20Khz. (I didn't run it higher than that since I might burn out my tweeter!) The RP8 cannot reproduce 20Hz, and I only start to hear sound around 30+Hz... makes sense since the RP8 freq response is stated at 45Hz to 20Khz.

It passes audio, sounds great! Gain selector switch working. Even at max setting of 66dB!!!

Connected a dynamic mic. Very clean even at high gain settings. I sometimes thought the unit was off because I can't hear any residual noise when I have my ears near the RP8. Then I tap the mic and yup... it's on and working.

Next, passed some music material. Very clean, no hum, no noise .

Played "Misssing (Remix version)" by EBTG. Woohoo... the bass is so deep and clean and distinct. Not muddy. Played some synth heavy music. The highs and mids are very clear too. And quiet! No hum or noise.

I think I'll probably build a 2nd prototype of the Rev1. PCB so I can listen to it on stereo! :)

I still need to test this using a condenser mic. But from all signs, I think it will work just fine and just be as good.

More update: Condenser Mic Testing/SM57 Mic Testing:

Tried testing with some condenser mics today. Niiice! I just used +18V for the 48V phantom power since my bench psu doesn't have 48V. You don't necessarily need to have +48V for your condenser mics to work. The mics all worked just fine even at +18V, no problem!

As for the sound... it really sounds very full and very nice.

And I was blown away when I plugged in an SM57 dynamic. It *really* sounds great. Not boomy or thin, not harsh, but you can hear everything clearly.

I don't have any high-end condenser mics, but I can tell you... even a cheap MXL 990 shines on this thing. Very clear. Lots of response.

And yes, also tried a $20 Nady dynamic mic. It's not as great as the SM57, but it's still clean and quiet. A little lacking on the high end compared to the SM57.

Rev3.00 PCB Prototype

So what's next?


Rev3.00 PCB Design

I'm going to send PCB Rev3.00 (shown above) for a prototype run, build a couple of units using the Rev3.00 PCB, check the final parts list and bill of materials... and if those units work great (which I'm sure), I'm going to send the PCB out for mass manufacturing... mass as in maybe 100-250 PCB units. I'm just a small-time potato running this operation in the garage.

What's new in Rev3.00?

1. Added J.W Miller inductors at the output for RFI protection
2. Added coupling caps for balanced line driver in the output stage
3. Added jumpers for easy setup
4. Added coupling capacitor in case you don't want a Servo design... or you want a Servo + AC coupling setup. Added jumper for those who don't want AC coupling.
5. Change value or Resistor for LED phantom power indicator. Made the LED brighter. (it was a bit dim on Rev1.00)

Ordering Info

I'm shooting for mid May to end of May when you can start ordering them.

So start saving!!!! For sure, it will be less than $100 per channel (for the kit version, with all the PCB and parts included. Just supply your own soldering iron.)

Discounts will be given for those purchasing 2 channels, or preamp and psu combo. Bigger discounts for those wanting to purchase 8 channels.

The SC-1 preamp worked and it sounds great, very quiet, very clear, with a great freq response.




| | # 
 Friday, April 27, 2007
Friday, April 27, 2007 10:34:17 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00) (  |  |  |  )
A lot has happened to the SC-1 mic preamp that I'm developing... that I didn't have time to update this site. Sorry about that.

Here's some new materials/information regarding the SC-1 mic preamp kit.

Basically, I'm getting close to when I can start selling the kits. I made 2 channels of prototype using the Revision 1 PCB design and I can tell you, I'm more than pleased with how it turned out. 

I also updated the design, added more enhancements and some small fixes (mainly, additional bypass capacitors, RF protection) and came up with a Revision 3 PCB. This Revision 3 design was sent out for another batch of prototype manufacturing, and I'll start building prototype #003 and #004 next week.

However!...  I made the decision to make a Revision 4 PCB design with some more enhancements. I think this is the last PCB revision before I start mass producing the PCB and then sell the kits to you guys.

Revision 4 PCB adds the following features:

1. Slow-start phantom power - ramp up the 48V phantom power slowly so mics will be happier, instead of subjecting them from 0Volts to 48Volts in an instant.

2. Added protection for INSERT out in case the output is short-circuited. The preamp will have INSERTs or has the capability for INSERT jacks and interfacing with the outside world. So you can use your compressor, or limiter using standard INSERT cables with the SC-1 preamp.

3. Added some changes to the gain selector stage to prevent popping at the higher gain level settings when switching gain. Again, this is not a *must have* fix, but it makes for a better and refined user experience.

So that's the latest on the SC-1 preamp.

Some photos of my SC-1 prototype #001 and #002.

Insert jacks not shown on this photo. This was taken before I added the INSERT jacks.


Rev1.00 PCB Prototype #001 Testing

Stuffing parts on the prototype #1 PCB, i.e. the PCB with the backwards selector switch. I want to get this working first, before I order another prototype for the REV 3.00 design.

Here's a photo I took of a partially stuffed PCB. I'm waiting for my 8-pin IC sockets to come in on Monday, then I'll be able to stuff the IC chips and get it working!

The switch shown on the photo is not the actual switch I spec'd in the parts list. But I don't want to use a $6-$8 switch for testing, so I jury rigged a $1 switch. It's not bad... and very stable and secure.

Did some changes on the Rev3.00 board... fixed the width of capacitors, aligned some components and some routing changes.


Signal Gen/Oscilloscope Testing

Soldered the IC sockets, applied 18-0-18 voltages, measure if the correct voltages are present in the correct pins... so far so good....

Insert all 3 IC chips....

Turn on power.... wait for any popping sound... None... Sniff for burnt smell.... None.... touch IC parts for hotness.... None. Everything is cool!

Proceeded to adjust knobs on my oscilloscope for a steady waveform, set my signal generator, and first I test the balanced driver circuit.

Here's a photo of my test rig/prototype.

I soldered some XLR jacks to make testing easier.

Checked the balanced driver stage....

Looks good!!!! I set the signal generator to sweep to a higher frequency... higher... higher... higher.... IN CASE YOU DIDNT NOTICE... That's 60Khz coming in and out of the balanced driver stage!!!! I'm pretty pleased.

Waveform looks pretty clean even at 60khz! WOW!

Since I don't have a selector switch, I just used a jumper to simulate a selector switch adjusting the dB gain selector. I then tapped from the output of the servo... which is after the mic pre. So in this waveform, the balanced driver isn't connected. I want to test each section of the preamp individually first.

So it works... I'm very pleased.

And of course, I know you'll want pictures so here it is.

I want you to take note of the waveform on the oscilloscope you see on the photo above, okay?

A separate photo of that same waveform is posted below... enlarged, with the camera about 5 inches away from the scope.

The top waveform is the input, and the bottom waveform is the output... just before clippinng. The oscilloscope was set to 5Volts per division. So it's roughly 30Volts peak to peak on +18/-18 power. The input is set to 2V per division.

Like it?

Well, you should. Because that waveform shot is at the max gain before clipping which is already an impressive 30Vp-p !!!!

And what's really impressive is it's doing this amplification to 30Vp-p of a 100Khz waveform AND the waveform still looks clean!!!! YES! 100 KILOHERTZ!!!! Yeay!

Here's the signal generator showing the 100 set on the dial, and the 1Khz multiplier.... as proof :)

This is going to be good!!!!!

It's getting late, so tomorrow, I'll connect the output of the pre to a potentiometer, then to the balanced driver stage.

And No... I haven't heard the preamp yet. I'm just doing signal gen testing, looking at the waveforms and looking for signs of trouble like oscillation and things like that.

But so far, so good. I'm liking what I'm seeing.

To do:
1. Add volume knob (because this prototype pcb didn't have the volume knob)
2. connect output of mic pre to balanced driver stage.
3. Test using a square wave
4. Connect RP8 monitor and do some listening tests using signal gen.
5. Play some music through it, via line level signals.
6. Test 48V phantom power.
7. Testing using condenser microphone
8. Optimize gain staging and dB steps of the preamp.
9. Test using long cables the mic pre output.
10. Test using long cables for the microphone input.
11. Really, really look for any oscillation.
12. Test at 15Hz or lower frequencies.
13. Find out highest possible frequency it can reproduce without distorting.

It's been a long wait, but I think it's going to be worth it. I am extremely pleased with the results I'm getting. And PCB rev3.00 will be even better.



| | # 
 Friday, March 16, 2007
Saturday, March 17, 2007 1:41:29 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  )
Okay, I received the PCBs from the fab.  It's pretty.  Measuring a tiny 2-1/2" by 2-1/8".

I'm selling a few extra PCBs as I ordered a few more than what I needed. Cost is $20 per board.

I test-built one of the PCBs to test that it's working properly. Here's my completed prototype PSU (+44V) and (+48V) for phantom power, suited for those racking their Yamaha PM1000 channel strips.



And here's a shot of the bare PCB.




I have a few extra PSU boards so if you're interested, the cost of the PCB is $20 each, +cost of shipping fees. I'll include a Bill of Materials with Digikey part numbers along with your PCB so you can order the parts direct from Digikey or Mouser or wherever.

Email me if you're interested to buy. Thanks!


| | # 
 Sunday, March 04, 2007
Sunday, March 04, 2007 10:53:40 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  |  )

The SC-1 Mic Preamp is a THAT 1510/1512/SSM2017/SSM2019/INA217 based Mic preamp with phantom power, DC servo and Balanced line output driver.

Rev.1.00 PCB Design for the SC-1 Preamp

Introduction

The THAT 1510 is a high performance audio preamplifier suitable for use in microphone preamp application. It is pin compatible with the now discontinued, Analog Devices SSM2019 and SSM2017 IC chips, and the Texas Instruments INA217 and INA163 mic preamp chips.

Designed from the ground up in THAT’s complementary dielectric isolation process and including laser-trimmed Si-Chrome thin film resistors, the THAT 1510 improve on existing integrated microphone preamps by offering lower noise at low gains, wider bandwidth, higher slew rate, lower distortion, and lower supply current. The parts feature internal ESD overload protection on all critical pins.

In short, the THAT 1510 provide superior performance in a popular format at an affordable price.

Features

* Low Noise:
1 nV/ ÖHz input noise (60dB gain)
34 nV/ ÖHz input noise (0dB gain) (1512)
* Low THD+N (full audio bandwidth):
0.0005% < 40dB gain
0.005% @ 60dB gain
* Low Current: 6 mA
* Wide Bandwidth: 7MHz @ G=100
* High Slew Rate: 19 V/µs
* Wide Output Swing: ±13.3V on ±15V supplies
* Gain adjustable from 0 to >60dB with
one external resistor
* Industry-standard pinouts

| | # 
 Saturday, February 10, 2007
Sunday, February 11, 2007 12:46:24 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  )
It's done... some pictures.  Using my custom PCB for the power supply, and an MCI output transformer on the outputs to convert it to balanced outs.

It works... sounds nice and clean!  The EQ lets you sculpt the sound nicely. No hum, no noise. It's great!



| | # 
 Wednesday, January 31, 2007
Thursday, February 01, 2007 1:55:59 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  )
I designed a new PSU for people who'd like to rack those Yamaha PM1000 channel strips.

The Yamaha PM1000 are usually called Japanese "Neves" because of a similar approach in design. Just like the Neves, this is all discrete transistor and uses an input transformer and output transformer.

The EQ section is especially sweet because there is not a single IC on this preamp. The EQ section uses inductors and capacitors... totally analog manipulation and shaping of your frequency. (circa 1974)

I've tested them on drums and vocals and they really make the sound FAT. The EQ section shapes your sound anywhere from slight barely noticeable to extreme gain/reduction. Bass frequencies are solid. Of course, being an analog EQ, it is not as precise in shaping the sound as IC chip Equalizers. But the curve is smoother I would think.

So if you're racking a PM1000 strip you bought from eBay, this PSU will be perfect for you. Output is +44VDC and +48VDC for the Phantom Power.

I'm having prototypes built. If you're interested, email me.

Screenshot:

PCB Rev.2.00



The new PCB designs will be smaller and double-sided measuring 2.25" x 2.25" 

I don't have this mass-manufactured, so I'm selling it at a low price just to recover some of my costs.  $20 each.  Email me first  before ordering. Thanks.
| | # 
 Thursday, January 25, 2007
Friday, January 26, 2007 2:57:50 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) ( )
Things are busy at DIY Central... I also had PCBs manufactured for my PRE-1048 preamp (link coming soon). This time, I used a company based in Malaysia.  I got the PCBs today too, same day as my PSU PCBs.

Well, I'm a bit disappointed at the quality. Let's just say it's nowhere near the quality of the other PCBs I got manufactured here in the US. (See photo of article below this.)

There's also no silkscreen (but I knew that before I placed the order).... it's also more expensive than the US manufacturer if you divide the total price by the number of PCBs you get.

To their credit, they got the PCBs manufactured correctly. :)

| | # 
Friday, January 26, 2007 2:48:53 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  )
This is a continuation from this article.
http://www.diy-central.com/DIYSplitPowerSupplyWith48VPhantomPower.aspx

Well, I received the PCBs today but it seems there was a manufacturing error. Everything is flipped/mirrored... Here's how the top layer looks like... the bottom layer is also flipped/mirrored.

BUMMER!



I sent this picture to the manufacturer along with what the Eagle board is supposed to look like. I emailed them... and within a couple of hours, I got a call from them on the phone apologizing for the mistake and they found out where in their process they had the mistake... they're going to remanufacture my boards and resend them to me at no charge!  Talk about great service!  The quality of the boards and it's workmanship do look very nice too, and their prices are great.

This is my first order from them, and even if they did screwed this up, I think I'll use them in the future. I like how they handled the problem very well and took steps to correct it.

I'll keep you guys updated about the progress.


| | # 
 Saturday, January 20, 2007
Saturday, January 20, 2007 10:31:43 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  )
I decided to rack the few remaining Sony MXP preamp and EQ modules I have. This particular mic pre module is using a discrete opamp enclosed in some green colored epoxy or something.

I've already racked a previous Sony mic pre and EQ, so I want this 2nd unit to match the layout of the first one I did. The only difference is this particular project, the mic pre does not have the Jensen transformers, and instead is using some discrete opamp, and will be in a black 1u case.

Here are some preliminary pictures.



The Mic Pre and EQ module I'll be racking.



Preparing the 1u front panel for drilling holes.

Having a drill press makes the job so much easier than using a hand drill. Safety first... don't forget to use goggles. Freak accidents happen, like a drill bit breaking and flying into your eye! (good thing I had the goggles!) So no matter show "quick" a job it is, don't forget your safety glasses or goggles.



| | # 
 Sunday, January 14, 2007
Monday, January 15, 2007 2:39:54 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  )
I decided to design my own PCB for a general split power supply with +48VDC phantom power. The one I'm currently using while compact in size doesn't leave any room for a heatsink. So I moved all TO-220 voltage regulators to the side so I'll be able to attach a big heatsink and keep those VR cool to the touch.

Here's the schematic and prototype PCB design. I'm having these PCBs fabricated, as a test prototype.


Schematic diagram. From this schematic, I created the PCB design and exported Gerber files.

Then using a third-party Gerber Viewer, I opened up the created Gerber files to double check my layout. So far, everything looks good.

| | # 
 Monday, January 01, 2007
Monday, January 01, 2007 11:35:38 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  )
This is a repost of my SSL Build Thread. Thanks to Gyraf.dk for the schematic plans.

The compressor is a clone based from the SSL4044E desk (1985 era). The SSL mixbus is actually an integrated part of the desk's main quad fader and autofade system. Click here for schematics.

There's been some mods to the original schematics for use with THAT VCAs. This page contains adjustments to the resistor values.

I also did some mods on my unit. Mainly, adding transformers at the output. Originally, the unit uses opamps for balanced outs. I have some MCI 416 output trafos that I used for my SSL unit.

The PCB...


| | # 
 Thursday, December 07, 2006
Friday, December 08, 2006 2:04:03 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  )
Just a continuation of the saga of building my 1176 clone compressor/limiter. Click here for Part 1

Parts arrived a few days ago, and other than the audio input and output transformers and chassis, I think I have enough parts to build (2) units. Here are some pics...

First, we have the output LL5402 Lundahl transformer and the LL1540 input transformer. Made in Sweden.  These things are small.



I got most of the capacitors and the power transformer at digikey.com. They have good prices for these components.




The rest of the parts like the pots, resistors, and ceramic/mylar parts came from Mouser.com. It's a big pile!







I'll clear up my work area and maybe this Christmas break, I'll be able to start construction.  Oh yeah, need to order some 2u case from Par-Metal.com.  I only have spare 1u cases in my workshop at the moment.

We're ready to build the 1176!

| | # 
 Sunday, December 03, 2006
Sunday, December 03, 2006 9:50:11 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  |  )
I've seen the new Zoom H4 Handy Recorder. I think it's a neat little thing! And best of all, it's "cheap" at $299. Of course, "cheap" is a relative word, but compared to other gear out there, this seems to be one of the low priced new entry. It looks good too!

While reading the H4 specs, this caught my eye... "The H4 features 2 studio-quality electret condenser microphones configured in an X/Y pattern for true stereo recording."  The keyword here is "electret microphone." And the picture seems to confirm that it's really just an electret mic.

So I'm thinking, maybe I can DIY my own stereo mic.

I've used an electret microphone on a non-audio project. I made a sound-triggered flash sync for my Canon EOS30D camera. In this case, I just used the audio output from the mic to trigger an SCR, which then triggered the camera flash.

Can we used the same electret mic to create a good enough sounding stereo mic? I think we can.

So I begin adapting my sound-triggered flash sync and while doing some Googling around, I came across this product.
Stereo Super Ear Amplifier Kit

It's a kit made by Velleman and it uses 2 electret mics, and a headphone output jack. Hmmmm.... interesting. So I ordered a kit (hey, it's less than $10 so if it didn't work, it's not too much of a loss). You can use the link above to order your own kit.

The circuit is simple... the Left and Right channel is the same, so the operation of the circuit is identical. Basically, an electret condenser microphone is biased for operation using a single resistor and capacitor. The output of the microphone goes to a potentiometer which acts as the volume control. This is then amplified by the NE5532 opamp, which is then routed to a headphone jack. Since the whole circuit operates from a single supply voltage (4.5Volts), the opamp uses a virtual ground by the use of 2 resistors in it's input pin. This of course, means that each leg of the split power supply will be only Vcc/2, where Vcc=4.5Volts.

I built this kit in less than an hour... while watching TV. And construction isn't hard and it's very simple. So if you're ready to jump into this Electronics hobby and looking for your first audio project, why not try this stereo mic kit? It's only less than $10.

Here are some pics during construction... enjoy.



There are assembly instructions and schematics on the box. Very easy to follow.
| | # 
 Thursday, November 30, 2006
Thursday, November 30, 2006 5:03:11 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  |  )

Moogheads, Tubeheads, VCOVandals, VCFFreaks, DCOOverlords... let's build some modular synths! Get your soldering irons hot, open up your browsers to Digikey and Mouser and your favorite surplus store because you'll be building some wicked synths, old  school style. Yup.. old school style, without PIC programming or embedded firmware that a bunch of codewarriors just programmed. No siree!... we're going to be pushing, bending, forcing electrons to do the work... not some silicon nerd that's just faking it.

You can buy ready-made units from here, pick and match what you need, wait 4 weeks, and then wait for Mr.Brown to deliver your packages. Then you'll be able to create sounds like this.

If you can't wait that long, or want the excitement of DIY, you can buy the ready-made PCBs, add a few parts and there you have it.  Look at all the stuff you can build.

This site is run by Ken Stone.
Schematics, parts list, and description and operation of the circuit are pain-stakingly written on the site. This is an excellent, excellent website! Check out Ken Stone's Modular Synth website.

Some pics to get your blood going...



| | # 
 Tuesday, November 28, 2006
Tuesday, November 28, 2006 10:28:29 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  )
This site belongs to an MIT student named Ladyada. The project is a very small MP3 player that can fit inside an Altoids mint can. She calls it the Minty MP3 player.

So for approx. $50, minimal total cost of $25 for parts, and $25 for a PCB, you can have your own MP3 player. This rates high on the geek factor. It's a pretty advanced project so if this is your first DIY, don't pick this as your first DIY project.
| | # 
 Sunday, November 26, 2006
Monday, November 27, 2006 1:58:07 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00) (  |  )
I use a Windows program called "Eagle" made by CadSoft Online. This is a great schematic to PCB design program to use. And best of all, it's FREE (some restrictions apply).  The learning curve is a little steep, but after a few hours of practice, it becomes intuitive and you begin to appreciate it's power and capability.



The Autorouter feature is great. Basically, the program will find the best possible path to connect your components together. Or, you can do it manually but the program still helps you by guiding you when connecting the points together.

Once you're done with your PCB design, you can send it off for manufacturing or prototyping.

UPDATE!!!!   Eagle software can now run on Mac OSX! Woohoo!!!  Caveat is, it's run under X11. But doesn't matter... because the files that I saved on the PC worked just fine when opened on the Mac OSX (X11) version.

Here's some screenshots.

The Eagle control panel running under OSX (X11)



The Board editor

| | # 
< noscript>